Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Express | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us
SEARCH WEB INQUIRER Powered by: Google
Mon, May 12, 2008 11:29 PM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
   HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE     TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Cityland

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Comment on this article on our Vox Populi blog  

  RELATED STORIES  




Hottest Tags

Cinema

WHAT'S THIS?                 More >>


imns


NOW SHOWING
Charm is no match for wit in Law-Caine starrer

By Rito Asilo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 19:56:00 03/07/2008

“Sleuth”
D: Kenneth Branagh
S: Michael Caine, Jude Law

MANILA, Philippines—It’s easy to imaging Kenneth Branagh’s noirish retelling of Joseph Mankiewicz’ 1972 mind-bender, “Sleuth,” as a theatrical two-hander, as it was originally intended by playwright Anthony Shaffer in 1970.

Avoiding Hollywood’s penchant for raucous noise and one-dimensional characters in suspense-thrillers, Branagh, tapping his familiarity with both theater and film, skillfully engages his movie’s crisply-paced 86-minute running time with organically blocked scenes and wittily rendered dialogue to examine an intriguing premise that is moved solely by two competing protagonists:

Drawn together by circumstance, successful mystery novelist, Andrew Wyke (Caine), lures handsome hairdresser cum aspiring actor, Milo Tindle (Law)—who happens to be the lover of Andrew’s wife, Marguerite—to his high-tech palatial manor in the English suburbs. In no time, the aging writer convinces the younger man to steal his wife’s million pounds’ worth of insured jewelry.

But, seeing how Milo balks at the plan, Andrew—who loves games and gadgets—explains how he sees the “staged” burglary as a win-win situation for the three of them: Even if the two-timing pair runs away with the expensive stash, Andrew nevertheless gets to evade paying alimony—if his wife files for divorce! Soon, however, the stakes get even higher.

There are many elements at play in Branagh’s cerebral thriller—especially once you get past the implausibility of Milo conveniently falling for Andrew’s bait. All throughout the film, the roles of prey and predator move in a constant flux, which keeps the exposition intriguingly dynamic!

As the production examines infidelity, culpability and sexual politics, it likewise shows that wit almost always trounces charm.

Moreover, there’s another element that seethes through the movie’s narrative cracks: Homoerotic tension.

On point of performance, Caine and Law are evenly matched: Wisdom and familiarity inform the 74-year-old Caine’s portrayal, while the 35-year-old Law has consistently shown his mastery at playing opportunistic, and often narcissistic pretty boys—like his acclaimed performances in 1997’s “Wilde,” in 1999’s “The Talented Mr. Ripley,” and in 2004’s “Closer.”

It’s interesting to note, though, that the 1970 play on which this movie is based was partly inspired by one of Shaffer’s close friends: Stephen Sondheim! The well-loved composer is said to have an intense interest in game-playing.

Two years and 1,222 performances later, the Tony Award-winning play was adapted for the screen, starring Laurence Olivier as Wyke and Caine as the opportunistic Tindle!

But, what makes Andrew and Milo’s conflict particularly engaging is the fact that the duel is between an actor and a writer: Who is smarter, then—the novelist who conveniently hides behind his powerful words, or the performer who brings them to life?



Copyright 2008 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
Digg this story    Blink List    Blink Bits    add to my del.icio.us    Reddit   Yahoo MyWeb Yahoo MyWeb


RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2008 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Veripay
INQ GAMES
Themes and Motifs
Inquirer Blogs
Jobmarket Online