Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns


Viewfinder
Will Smith plays scruffy superhero

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 03:50:00 07/20/2008

Filed Under: Cinema, Entertainment (general)

MANILA, Philippines - When actors move up to the superstar level, they?re tempted to play it safe and keep giving viewers mere variations on the sort of film performance that made them popular in the first place.

This scenario of diminishing returns accounts for the abridged careers of some formerly big stars, because in the movie biz, over-familiarity does breed, if not contempt, eventual boredom.

One superstar who is in no danger of constantly referencing himself into oblivion is Will Smith. Yes, he?s had his clunkers, but on the whole, he?s provided viewers with enough variety in his projects and performances to keep them interested enough to make his movies gross billions of dollars.

Take his latest starrer, ?Hancock.? The film both pleases and surprises because it?s full of hooks and twists. Its central hook is its decision to cast Smith as the most unheroic superhero who ever lived.

At film?s start, Smith?s unconventional character, Hancock, is a drunk who saves people and solves crimes, but turns off the populace of Los Angeles because of his boorish ways and decidedly rancid appearance.

Anithesis of bravery

Why is this hero the antithesis of traditional bravery and nobility? It turns out that he?s an amnesiac who has nobody to love him, so he takes his loneliness out on others.

Enter a PR whiz played by Jason Bateman, who convinces Hancock to change his image and thus win the love and gratitude of the populace. At first, Hancock balks at the radical transformation, but he eventually agrees to give it a good try.

When the PR ploy works, Hancock is in seventh heaven?but not for long. Due to another twist that we can?t detail here for fear of you twisting our neck, Hancock discovers another major problem that shunts his life into yet another conflicted direction, and leads to the movie?s bittersweet denouement.

Let?s just say that new twist involves the PR man?s wife, portrayed by Charlize Theron, who turns out to be quite different from her initial ?sweet housewife? projection. And we?d better stop right there, for fear of letting the yowling cat out of the bag.

Despite this unnecessary lack of detail, the relationship between Smith and Theron?s characters adds a new layer to the film?s story and thematic pertinence. This leads to a beguiling study of superheroism itself, in contrast to the lives mere mortals live, and the intimations generated by this new twist.

Image makeover

It?s in this penultimate section that the two stars? gift flares with uncommon sheen and creativity. Yes, ?Hancock? is ?only? a movie about a scruffy ?hero,? but stars are occasionally able to make it more than that.

They do this by understanding their characters? unique issues, dilemmas and mind-sets, which lesser actors would merely gloss over.

It?s true that, when Hancock agrees to his PR friend?s image-makeover campaign, the movie loses some of its dynamism and becomes a bit of a predictable bore. But as one new hook follows another, that desultory impression is vanquished soon enough, as the film starts ?working? on different levels.

That?s why ?Hancock? ends up as a viewing treat: Its superhero rescues are excitingly staged, its characters? relationships are movingly depicted, its thematic comparisons between mortals and immortals are beguiling, and most of its disparate elements come into fine focus at film?s end.

Yes, the film can be escapist?but the good news is, the world that it escapes into is rich enough to merit our interest and involvement.

Maui vs Precious

Sexy Maui Taylor and Precious Adona are pitted against each other in the new film, ?Torotot,? produced by Viva Films and Production 56. Maui is especially pleased with her love scenes with Andrew Schimmer, and Precious has her own seductive highlights. Another plus for the film, which opens next month, is the fact that it?s directed by Maryo J. delos Reyes.



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile