Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns



TV is the new ‘film’ industry

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 20:53:00 03/20/2009

Filed Under: Television, Entertainment (general)

FOR A DECADE now, the mainstream Filipino movie industry has languished in a deep and dismal slump, with its annual output cut down from a high of 200 features to a low of less than 50. ?Indie? films have tried to fill in the blank, but many of its productions haven?t substantially reached and connected with the huge mainstream audience.

Popularity

Instructively, at about the same time, television has surged to unprecedented heights of popularity, with its daytime and evening teleseryes topping the ratings and pulling in millions of viewers?just like a big mainstream movie used to do.

Thus, our latest pop-cultural epiphany: Contrary to the usual pessimistic scuttlebutt, the Filipino movie industry isn?t dead, it isn?t dying?it?s alive and well: On TV.

The last time we counted, there were some 20 different drama series on the small screen. With the major channels changing series from three to four times a year apiece, that?s an annual total of some 100 different productions. ?That?s an entire ?film? industry?s very respectable annual output right there!

Star value

Of course, TV drama series really aren?t movies?but, wait a minute: Other similarities include the series? star value, with multiple TV-movie luminaries headlining them to assure strong viewer interest, and the shows? budgets that run into the millions, some of them rivaling the big bucks invested in blockbuster films.

Plus: These days, many teleseryes use the titles and plots of movies that were popular many years ago, further strengthening the film-TV connection.

Note, too, that many movie stars aren?t facing the film cameras these days, so they would be jobless and penniless?if they weren?t so busy acting in teleseryes. So, the serial TV ?movies? have also provided the important service of keeping many film stars financially secure and solvent. And they are able to practice their craft?well, sort of.

That?s one of the negative aspects of this TV-movie equation: The acting on teleseryes is generally stereotypical, overly melodramatic, full of sound and fury signifying little?and thus, not really very good. In fact, sometimes, it?s quite bad.

One of the reasons for this is the fact that daily soaps ?have? to be full of ?colorful? characters, situations, problems and complications, in order to keep regular viewers interested and watching. Each daily ?chapter? ?has? to end with a new dramatic twist that will be resolved in the following day?s installment, and that doesn?t make for good storytelling or acting.

Victims

Worse, hit teleseryes end up as victims of their own success. To make more money out of popular drama series, they are stretched out for months, and their original storylines get so distended that they end up making no sense at all.

Worst of all, to economize, teleseryes are produced in ?round the clock taping binges with many sequences shot per day. As any TV worker will tell you, that numbing schedule soon takes its toll on everybody?s performance. After a while, cast and crew members become mere factory workers who simply churn out quantity rather than quality.

So, everything considered, TV series don?t end up as good ?movies??but, they are popular, and that makes them ?mainstream.? So they still end up as yet another alternative ?film? industry to help all of us bide our time, until the real movie industry recovers!



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile