Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns



Free from censorship

By Bayani San Diego Jr.
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 00:01:00 07/26/2009

Filed Under: Cinema, Entertainment (general)

MANILA, Philippines?Quite interestingly, controversial and X-rated films were given a public exhibition because of the Netpac competition of the Cinemalaya film festival, which wraps up at the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) Sunday.

Netpac or the Network for the Promotion of Asian Cinema is composed of film critics from all over the world.

Among the films vying for the Netpac prize are Paolo Villaluna and Ellen Ramos? ?Walang Hanggang Paalam? and Adolfo Alix Jr.?s ?Aurora,? both rated X by the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB).

Meanwhile, a third entry, ?Bayaw,? created buzz because of its full-frontal male nudity. A fourth Netpac film, Auraeus Solito?s ?Boy,? was banned in Singapore because of ?a long gay love scene? as well.

Villaluna said that the film?s journey from censorship to the CCP was long and arduous. ?It makes you realize that filmmaking has become a struggle in this country. It?s frustrating ... but we are totally relieved to premiere at the CCP.?

Alix concurred: ?It?s a bit liberating ... A lot of the viewers were puzzled by the double ?X? rating. Still, ?Aurora? can?t be shown outside of UP and the CCP.?

Villaluna explained: ?Although Ellen and I think a regulatory board is a necessary social responsibility, it is more important to have a credible set of reviewers in that group.?

Some of the current board members, he said, ?have a hard time differentiating prurient from relevant films.?

Alix said: ?The board should focus their efforts on reevaluating PD 1986 (the law that created the MTRCB). A bill has been submitted to Congress to amend PD 1986. Hopefully, it sees the light of day.?

Classification, not censorship

Classification, not censorship, is the answer, noted Danio Caw, producer of ?Bayaw.? ?Some feel that censorship may hamper the growth of the indie scene, but I doubt if it can stop filmmakers who wish to express themselves.?

Cinemalaya and the Netpac competition provide a venue for films that would otherwise meet resistance from the censors, Caw, Alix and Villaluna agreed.

?Cinemalaya and Netpac help producers and directors express their ideas in the most integral way possible,? said Caw.

?Approval (from Cinemalaya and Netpac) meant a lot especially for a film like ?Aurora? which had been dismissed as gratuitous.? Alix said.

Villaluna, however, owned up that filmmakers have a social responsibility, too. ?It?s a two-way street. A lot of filmmakers exploit the digital medium by making trashy porn films. We cannot stop that. The democratization of cinema comes with that reality. You just have to take the good with the bad.?

That?s precisely why the censors? role becomes all the more crucial, Villaluna reiterated.

In the meantime, the Netpac competition, ?a first in the Philippines,? said Villaluna, ?underlines the fact that local cinema is making waves abroad.?

?That an international organization recognized our country [means that] we are closer to sharing our cinema and culture to a worldwide audience. Hopefully we get to maximize the attention... because the world is looking at the Philippines now,? Villaluna said.

Other films competing for the Netpac prize are Ralston Jover?s ?Baseco Bakal Boys,? Yeng Grande?s ?Prinsipe ng Sabong,? Seymour Barros Sanchez?s ?Handumanan,? Jowee Morel?s ?Latak? and Alix?s ?Karera.?

E-mail: bayanisandiego@hotmail.com



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile