Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  

GALLERY
 
Zoom ImageZoom   

SARAH Lahbati




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns


Viewfinder
Not the best ‘Starstruck’ season

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 23:52:00 02/27/2010

Filed Under: Celebrities, Television, Entertainment (general)

MANILA, Philippines?It was definitely ?mixed emotions? time for me when I caught the ?Starstruck 5? finals last week. Ever since the talent discovery tilt started, my eye was on female bets Sarah Lahbati and Princess Snell, so I was pleased as punch when Sarah romped off with the top female plum.

On the other hand, male winner Steven Silva was on my least likely to succeed list, so I was surprised, to say the least, when he bagged the top male award.

Why such a contradictory combination of winners? Well, when a tilt?s verdict is largely decided by viewers? votes (and the subjective output of ?vote-generating machines?), expect the completely unexpected!

We developed an early preference for Sarah not just because she was a looker, but also because she was one of the best singers in the competition. That may not be saying much, because many of the finalists couldn?t sing a note to save their lives, but due notice must nevertheless be paid to one of the better vocalists in the atonal bunch.

And, much to her credit, Sarah was one of the few (or was she the only one?) to sing live in the tilt?s final show, so bully for her.

What about Steven that didn?t allow us to warm up to him? He was aw-shucks skittish, awkward and unfocused, and like many other Fil-Am imports, couldn?t speak Tagalog well.

Frankly, we?ve had it up to here with Fil-Ams who don?t bother to learn to speak the language before they come here to try their luck in local show biz, so we dismissed Steven as the latest cultural carpetbagger to hit our shores.

To be fair, his Tagalog did ?improve? in the course of the tilt ?but not nearly well enough for him to do well as an actor in the biz right after winning the ?Starstruck? tilt.

Having said all that, we must conclude that ?Starstruck 5? wasn?t the tilt?s best edition?not by a long shot. Therefore, we believe that its selection process should be drastically overhauled, to produce better and stronger discoveries, to wit:

Instead of calling for auditions and then announcing its finalists for its next edition, ?Starstruck? should insert a long post-audition but pre-finalist step, during which the best 100 auditionees will be given extensive training in different aspects of performance.

Periodically, the 100 initial survivors will be whittled down to the best 70, 60, then 50 ? during which their training continues. This process can take months, because its objective is to produce, not raw finalists, but talents who have already undergone rigorous training and evaluating long before they are even introduced to the viewing and voting public.

If the long training and selection process we are suggesting is done well, the tilt?s 50 survivors should already be a pretty good bunch of talents.

But, the winnowing-down process should continue ?down to the best 40, 30, 20?and then the ?official? 12 finalists.

It is hoped that, with this longer and much more rigorous training and selection process, the tilt will be able to produce finalists who not only look good, but are also truly gifted singers, actors and/or dancers. Otherwise, ?Starstruck? will just continue to be stuck.



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile