Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  





 OTHER COLUMNS


imns


Viewfinder
Only on Philippine TV

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 22:33:00 06/22/2010

Filed Under: Entertainment (general), Television

MANILA, Philippines?Watching television is supposed to be a daily delight, but it?s occasionally a confounding and off-putting experience. Current and recent irritants on the local small screen:

Judged

On the noontime talent search, ?Showtime,? a weird innovation has been effected that must be a first in the televiewing world: Each week, viewers have the power to vote one judge off! The astounding innovation flies in the face of what the talent judging process is supposed to be all about: It?s the judges who judge, not the other way around.

Any self-respecting judge of talents would refuse to agree to such a weird set-up, but the current jurors on ?Showtime? appear to have no such compunction?or pride in the value of their work.

To make things worse, the judges are expected, not just to judge, but also to ?entertain? the viewers by singing, dancing, doing comedy or otherwise showing off their talents. The fact that some of the ?performing judges? aren?t really talented or entertaining is beside the point. All they should really be required to do is come up with insightful and objective decisions, period.

Only on Philippine TV, indeed?

Contested

Also confounding was the recent occurrence on ?Wowowee,? when a contestant decided to accept the cash prize rather than taking a risk in the hope of making a lot more money?but , the hosts and studio audience were making so much noise that nobody heard her final decision!

Only after she protested and the show?s tape was played back did the hosts realize that they had made a big booboo, and she was given the cash prize that she was entitled to. Just the same, the show ended up with egg on its collective face.

This is a sad example of TV hosts focusing so much on ?energy!? and ?excitement!? that they forget the basic focus of a game show should be on its contestants and their all-important decisions, not on loud and livid ?fun? and games. How amateurish can you get?

Undeserved

We?re also turned off by the number of Fil-Am TV ?hosts? who can?t speak Tagalog well, but are still made to mouth spiels in the most stilted and silly way. Erring show producers obviously don?t care if they tick viewers off, as long as their tisoy proteges are given the breaks that they don?t deserve.

The bottom line is, new TV hosts should first learn the language really well before they dare to say a word in front of the TV cameras. It?s not about you, guys, it?s all about the viewers or should be, so don?t ?practice? on TV at their expense!

Compromised

More: We?re getting a lot of complaints from viewers about TV shows? irresponsible use of child talents. Among the complaints are ?too adult? portrayals by juvenile talents, who are sometimes made to play bar girls, sexy ?models,? dirty old men, gays, etc.

The excuse is that the roles are supposed to be funny and thus shouldn?t be taken seriously, but the young talents? welfare is still compromised. TV people should treat child talents with the special care and consideration they deserve.



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share


OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile