Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns


Viewfinder
Exceptional portrayals in Cinemalaya’s New Breed features

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 16:43:00 07/25/2010

Filed Under: Cinema, Entertainment (general), Awards and Prizes

First things first: The recent sixth Cinemalaya film festival came on particularly strong this year with its new (Veteran) Directors Showcase, which featured new movies by Mark Meily, Gil Portes and Mario O?Hara, among others.

However, we don?t agree with the festival?s decision to hand out awards for this category, for the simple reason that there were less than 10 movies competing. In our view, nine or 10 would be the minimum number of entries to merit an awards competition.

In the future, the festival should provide production grants to more established filmmakers, or hold the showcase as a non-award category.

Yes, there were some worthy showcase entries, like ?Donor? and ?Two Funerals,? which we were able to view. But there simply were too few films in contention to deserve awards, which are supposed to honor relative excellence in a significantly substantial and representative field of contention.

This is the same objection we?ve raised in relation to the awards handed out at the annual Metro Manila Film Festival, with its only six or so movies in contention. The MMFF waters down the value of its awards further by opting for a generally commercial and popular thrust for the movies it showcases.

Quality and substance

Awards should be about quality and substance?so why honor productions that are less than truly outstanding?

Let?s focus today on the quality of the performances in the main New Breed section of this year?s Cinemalaya. We?ve managed to view quite a number of the New Breed entries, so our opinions are based on actual viewing, not speculative fancy:

In general, the New Breed movies offered more textured and significant characters and portrayals than those found in mainstream movies. This is the reason that ?name? actors agree to appear in indie productions, despite the relatively token talent fees they?re offered.

We agree with this year?s festival jurors that John Arcilla turned in the best male lead portrayal in ?Halaw??his depiction of a man who smuggles Filipinos into Sabah, Malaysia is raw and textured.
Lovi Poe, who won Best Actress for ?Mayohan,? also turns in an interesting and focused portrayal, but we feel Irma Adlawan in ?Vox Populi? came up with a portrayal that had wider range and greater depth, despite its occasional ?staginess.?

Quiet but moving

Best Supporting Actress? Yes, LJ Reyes was softly, quietly but deeply moving in ?The Leaving.? But we don?t agree with the decision to cite Emilio Garcia as Best Supporting Actor for his portrayal of the nasty sergeant in ?Rekrut,? because his nastiness was quite standard for such a character, and his movie-star persona wasn?t sufficiently subsumed into the role.

If we had our druthers, the award should have gone to either Jose Mari Avellana or Roeder Camañag in ?Vox Populi,? because they came up with more original and insightful portrayals.

The New Breed movies featured quite a number of other potentially ?awardable? portrayals that similarly deserve to be singled out: The ?tough? little child actress in ?Halaw,? Maria Isabel Lopez in the same film, Suzette Ranillo in ?Vox Populi,? some of the young trainees in ?Rekrut,? etc. Perhaps an ?ensemble? award could be added next year?

On the other hand, we must note a negative tendency to present characters who simply go through life?s ordeals in a sort of dull, unemotional psychological daze.



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile