Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  





imns



SC defends judge in Maguindanao massacre case

By Tetch Torres
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 19:56:00 09/02/2010

Filed Under: Maguindanao Massacre, Crime and Law and Justice, Murder, Judiciary (system of justice)

MANILA, Philippines?The Supreme Court on Thursday defended a lower court?s decision to postpone the Maguindanao massacre trial, saying the judge handling the case was just following the rules of court.

?I don?t see any error,? high court spokesman Jose Midas Marquez.

Quezon City Regional Trial Court Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes moved Wednesday?s trial of 197 people, accused in the massacre of 57 people in the November 23 Maguindanao carnage, to September 8.

The court conducted a three day preliminary conference last month and issued a pre-trial order that would govern the trial and both the defense and prosecution panels were given time to comment.

But the defense lawyers of the accused members of the powerful Ampatuan clan and their alleged cohorts told Reyes at Wednesday?s session in an improvised courtroom at Camp Crame that they needed more time to study the pretrial case summary.

Marquez said both parties needed to comment and submit their agreement to the pre-trial order.

Relatives of the victims of the massacre had expressed disgust over the delay and Justice Secretary Leila De Lima ordered prosecutors to seek the intervention of the Supreme Court as she accused defense lawyers of resorting to numerous petitions to delay the proceedings.

But Marquez said the high tribunal saw no reason to intervene.

?She is a very competent judge. We don?t see any reason to interfere. We submit to the discretion of the court,? he said.



Copyright 2012 INQUIRER.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


Share


OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile