Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Century Properties
Geo Estate

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Entertainment Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Showbiz & Style > Inquirer Entertainment

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns



Celebrity ‘cultists’ should go into rehab

By Nestor Torre
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 21:41:00 04/29/2011

Filed Under: Celebrities, Entertainment (general), Television

IN THE BEGINNING, there were no show biz stars. ?Would you believe? It sounds impossible, but it?s true. When films were first made, most of the people who appeared in them weren?t popular actors, they were just nameless men and women who did what they were told, no fuss and bother, and no huge talent fees?and egos.

Then, little by little, viewers of the first one-reel productions (many of them simply recording what people ordinarily did in real life, like crossing the street while trying not to get hit by the first automobiles) began to get identified by the viewing public.

Movie makeup became more realistic, so they stopped looking like pasty-face caricatures, and the best-looking among them emerged as appealing personalities?so, people wanted to know their names. As they made more movies, they became the cinema?s first stars, ending up lionized, pampered and loved all over the moviegoing world.

Medium

The same was true of television, which started as only a medium to advertise products on sale, then rapidly developed into the hugely popular, influential and transcendent medium it is today.

The first TV stars were generally ?borrowed? from the movies, the theater and radio, but TV has become so popular and pervasive that the reverse is now true: Many stars discovered by TV shows have become multimedia sensations, making tens of millions of dollars each year.

In fact, some of them have become so popular that they have emerged as political leaders, with Ronald Reagan even becoming president of the United States. In addition, the cult of stellar celebrity has become so pervasive that stars have become newsmakers and opinion-formers in their own right, with people hanging onto everything they say and do, no matter how banal or ill-advised.

Influence

This is where the Cult of Celebrity has become a negative influence in our midst. Hundreds of photographers and videographers hound and hunt them down, immortalizing their most insignificant activities from morning till night, which in turn are then avidly reported by the broadcast media in the many new shows created just for them, which are hungrily lapped and gobbled up by hundreds of millions of viewers all over the world.

Worse, celebrities are regarded as acutely wise social and political pundits, whose opinions on everything are taken as the new Gospel truth, even if some of these beautiful people lead such rash, brash and unenlightened lives.

Why would anyone want to know, let alone be impressed by and believe in, what stars think about current topics and pressing social problems? Because they?re popular, and their merest, most thoughtless musings and burps are automatically recorded by the traditional and new social media.

Excesses

Thus has the world been held in thrall by the new high priests of the new religion, the cult of celebrity, the excesses of which have become so negatively influential that it?s time for all avid celebrity-watchers to go into self-imposed ?rehab? to kick their unhealthy celebrity habit and vice.

How to do this? Stop talking, thinking and reporting about them, aside from their work and products as entertainers. Let them live their lives in private. Don?t ask them about, or give undue importance, to their opinions about all sorts of weighty topics under the trendy sun?they?re ?experts? only at being celebrities, period!

Why should we get so impressed, excited and mesmerized by stars whose stellar glitter is largely artificial and manufactured, and are mostly famous only for being famous. Why, indeed?



Copyright 2012 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2012 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Pacquiao
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile